The tampa scale for kinesiophobia tsk is commonly used in clin ical practice to quantify levels of painrelated fear of activity or. The tampa scale for kinesiophobia tsk, an instrument for measuring fear of movementreinjury, has been confirmed as an important predictor for the persistence of painrelated disability. The paper was written in adherence to the guidelines of the strobe statement for the full checklist, see additional file 1. The original tsk questionnaire contained 17 items that assessed subjective ratings of fearrelated concepts. Pdf kinesiophobia introducing a new diagnostic tool. Psychometric properties of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia and the fearavoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain. Gregg, dip phys, post grad dip manip th, mhealsca, greg mcintosh, mscb, hamilton hall, md, frcscb, heather watson, bhk, mscpta, david williams, bphtya, chrisw. Kinesiophobia is defined by the developers as an irrational, and debilitating fear of physical movement and activity resulting from a feeling of vulnerability to painful injury or reinjury kori et al.
Tampa scale of kinesiophobia tsk betterworld healthcare. Each item has a fourpoint likert scale with scoring. Hospital anxiety and depression scale hads was used to evaluate mood status. Tampa scale for kinesiophobia miller, kori and todd 1991 1 strongly disagree 2 disagree 3 agree 4 strongly agree 1. Validation of the portuguese version of the tampa scale for. Im afraid that i might injury myself if i exercise 1 2 3 4. Pdf psychometric properties of the tampa scale for. This is a list of phrases which other patients have used to express how the view their condition. The tampa scale for kinesiophobia tsk, an instrument for. The tampa scale of kinesiophobia tsk that was developed in 1990 is a 17 item scale originally developed to measure the fear of movement related to chronic. The tampa kinesiophobia scale tks was applied to determine the level of fear of movement. Analysis of the psychometric properties of the brazilian version the. Validation of the portuguese version of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia heart tsksv heart.
The relationship between the tampa scale of kinesiophobia and. Psychometric properties of the fearavoidance beliefs questionnaire and tampa scale of kinesiophobia in patients with shoulder pain. The tampa scale of kinesiophobia and neck pain, disability and. Analysis of shortened versions of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing scale for patients after. One such tool is the tampa scale for kinesiophobia tsk. The tsk is a 17item self report checklist using a 4point likert scale that was developed as a measure of fear of movement or reinjury.
Please circle the number that best describes how you feel about each statement. The applicability of the tampa scale of kinesiophobia for patients with subacute neck pain. Pdf portuguese language version of the tampa scale for. The tampa scale for kinesiophobia tsk, an instrument for measuring. Tampa scale for kinesiophobia miller et al 1991 a total score is calculated after inversion of the individual scores of items 4, 8, 12 and 16. To determine the psychometric properties of the 11item tampa scale for kinesiophobia tsk11 in patients with heterogeneous. Pdf objectives the aim of this study was to translate and adapt the tampa scale for kinesiophobia to the portuguese language and culture tskpt, and. Although the tampa scale for kinesiophobia tsk is useful for measuring fear of movement in patients with musculoskeletal pain, no psychometrically validated japanese version is available. The relationship between the tampa scale of kinesiophobia. Tampa scale of kinesiophobia betterworld healthcare. The tampa scale for kinesiophobia, or fear of movement, is used in patients who display abnormal motor behavior possibly rooted in the false beliefs that movement equals injury. Clinical study the relationship between the tampa scale of kinesiophobia and low back pain rehabilitation outcomes chris d. Pdf on what patients does the tampa scale for kinesiophobia fit. Pdf reproducibility, responsiveness and validation of.
1048 75 1527 1487 164 349 1396 255 1036 434 1583 1414 329 372 1033 456 599 1503 1209 572 1526 546 376 702 1069 1209 1379 363 248 748 469 676 484 1295 152 1123 1198 1020 362